Tag Archive for: Hague abduction convention

Masters Law Group Hague Convention Case Review: The District of Iowa / Mexico

International parental abduction is a complex and emotionally charged issue that affects families worldwide. At Masters Law Group, we are committed to protecting the rights of parents and children under international law. In our most recent Hague Convention case, we succeeded in a landmark ruling in favor of our client.

In this case, which concluded on August 27, 2024, the respondent—represented by Masters Law Group—sought the return of her child, who had been taken from the United States. The Hague Convention helps protect children from international abduction. It allows a parent to petition for the return of their child to the country of habitual residence when wrongful removal or retention occurs.

Legal Framework and Key Issues

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) is designed to protect children from international abduction by helping ensure their prompt return to their habitual residence. To succeed in a petition under the Convention, the petitioner must establish that the child was wrongfully removed from their habitual residence and that the removal violated custody rights under the law of the habitual residence country. In this case, the key issues revolved around determining the child’s habitual residence, whether the petitioner had consented to the child’s removal, and whether returning the child to Mexico would pose a grave risk to their safety.

For the reasons stated below, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Amended Petition is DENIED. [ECF No. 5].

Case Overview

The parties’ relationship began in 2015, and they have since lived in various states in the U.S. before relocating to Mexico in 2023. In November 2023, the respondent took the child back to the United States, citing concerns for their safety, and sought a protective order against the petitioner. The order, granted by an Iowa state court, effectively barred the petitioner from contact with the respondent and their child, E.L.S., until November 2024, requiring the child to remain in Iowa. This led to the petitioner filing under the Hague Convention, claiming that the child was wrongfully removed from Mexico, the country of habitual residence.

Case Background

The court found that the child’s habitual residence was in the United States, not Mexico. Although the family had lived in Mexico briefly, the court determined that the child had not fully acclimated to life there. Factors such as the child’s young age, the short duration of residence in Mexico, and the family’s strong ties to the United States played a crucial role in this determination. The court concluded that the child was more “at home” in the United States, where she had spent most of her life.

The court examined whether the petitioner had consented to the child’s retention in the United States. The protective order issued by the Iowa state court, to which the petitioner had consented, included a provision that the child was to remain in Iowa until further orders. The court interpreted this consent as a concession to the child’s retention in the United States.

The respondent argued that returning the child to Mexico would expose her to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm due to the domestic violence she had experienced from the petitioner. The court found sufficient evidence of such a risk, considering the documented history of violence between the parties. The court concluded that returning the child to Mexico would indeed place her in an intolerable situation.

Case Results

After reviewing the evidence and legal arguments, the court accepted and adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court ruled that the petitioner had not proven that Mexico was the child’s habitual residence and that the child was wrongfully removed. Additionally, the defenses of acquiescence and grave risk were sufficiently established. As a result, the court denied the Amended Petition for the Return of the Child to Mexico.

The case is hereby closed.

Date: August 27, 2024.

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE.

Hague Convention Law With Masters Law Group

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have vast knowledge and experience with the Hague Convention, which was enacted through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”). Parents whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States must petition for the child’s return.

If you are facing child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention, Masters Law Group can help. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

Check out our featured Hague Decisions here.

Hague Convention Attorney: Helping Families Across the Globe

International parental disputes can pose significant legal challenges in today’s interconnected world. With 91 U.S. Hague Convention Treaty Partners in 2024, it protects children and their parents from the harmful effects of wrongful international abductions.

If you are facing the possibility of international parental child abduction or have urgent questions, this guide will help you understand how a Hague Convention attorney can assist you. Here’s what you need to know.

WHAT IS THE HAGUE CONVENTION?

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA).

The original Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 were large international treaties that set rules for countries to follow during war. Since then, more Hague conventions have occurred, and the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) was created to establish and support international laws.

Different countries have signed and agreed to each part of the Hague Conventions, so there isn’t a single list of countries that are part of all of them. However, as of March 2022, the HCCH includes 91 permanent members: 90 countries (most of which are also United Nations members) and the European Union. To date, the United States partners with 68 other countries under the Hague Abduction Convention. The full list is available at the bottom of the page.

There were two specific goals in mind at the time of The Hague Services Convention’s formation:

  • Create a means to help ensure that judicial and extrajudicial documents are brought to the addressee’s attention in sufficient time.
  • Help improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

HOW DOES THE HAGUE CONVENTION WORK?

Understanding the Hague Convention is crucial for families facing international parental disputes. This international treaty helps resolve cases where a child is wrongfully taken or kept in another country. In 2023, the Hague Convention successfully returned children in about 39% of cases  (2,180 applications to have a child (or children) returned under the Convention). Understanding this process can help protect your rights and help ensure that your child’s well-being is prioritized.

If your child is taken to another country without your permission, the Hague Convention provides a process to seek their return. Here’s how it works:

  1. File a Petition: Contact the central authority in your country to file a petition under the Hague Convention. They will guide you through the process.
  2. Legal Proceedings: The Central Authority contacts its counterpart in the country where the child is located, and legal proceedings are initiated.
  3. Court Hearing: A court in the country where the child is found will determine if the child was wrongfully removed or retained.
  4. Return Process: If the court finds that the removal was wrongful, it will order the child’s return to their country of habitual residence.

EXCEPTIONS TO IMMEDIATE RETURN

The Hague Convention provides a framework for the return of wrongfully removed or retained children. However, there are specific exceptions to the immediate return of a child, aimed at addressing various circumstances where returning the child might not be in their best interest. Here are the key exceptions:

  • Grave Risk: The court may refuse to return the child if there is evidence that the return would endanger the child’s health or safety. This can include situations where the child might face abuse, neglect, or severe emotional distress. Evidence of such risks must be substantial and specific to the circumstances of the case.
  • Passage of One Year: If more than a year has elapsed since the wrongful removal or retention, and the child is well-settled in their new environment, the court may decide that returning the child is not in their best interest. The court assesses whether the child has adapted to their new surroundings and whether a return would disrupt their stability.
  • Petitioner Not Exercising Custodial Rights: If the petitioner has not been actively fulfilling their custodial responsibilities or has not sought to exercise their rights in the country of habitual residence, the court may consider this in its decision. The focus is on whether the petitioner’s actions align with the parental responsibilities and rights defined by custody arrangements. 

WHAT FAMILIES SHOULD KNOW

Families across the globe need to understand the importance of the Hague Convention when they find themselves involved in international parental disputes. If you find yourself in this situation, here are some tips you can follow.

  • Prompt action is crucial: If you believe your child has been wrongfully removed or retained in a Hague Convention country, it is essential to act promptly. Initiating legal proceedings increases the chances of a successful resolution.
  • Contact the central authority: In the United States, the Office of Children’s Issues within the U.S. Department of State is the foremost authority for Hague Convention matters. They can provide valuable information, resources, and assistance in locating and returning your child.
  • Gather evidence: It is essential to gather evidence demonstrating your child’s habitual residence and the wrongful removal or retention. Documentation such as birth certificates, parental orders, and communication records can strengthen your case.
  • Consulting with a family law attorney: A family law attorney with experience in Hague law matters is highly recommended. They can guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of the Hague Convention.

WORKING WITH A HAGUE CONVENTION ATTORNEY

Working with a Hague Convention attorney can greatly improve your chances of resolving a parental dispute efficiently and effectively. They can help you navigate the legal process and advocate for your rights and interests. One major advantage of working with the Hague Convention attorneys at Masters Law Group is their experience in mediation and negotiation. Their experience can help resolve disputes without going to court by encouraging constructive discussions and finding agreeable solutions.

At Masters Law Group, we understand the complexities of international parenting disputes and the importance of finding solutions. We prioritize clear communication with our clients to address your concerns and keep you informed throughout the legal process.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Understanding the Hague Convention and its implications is vital for U.S. families dealing with international child abduction cases. Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge in handling cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system. Let our Hague Convention attorneys help you navigate international child abduction cases with confidence and care.

To demonstrate our competence, here are a few recent Hague decisions we have successfully managed:

Contact us today to schedule your complimentary consultation.

HAGUE CONVENTION COUNTRIES

Below you will find an overview of all the countries that have signed the Hague Convention. Here you can find whether the Hague Convention applies between two other countries.

Country Convention State Date
Afghanistan No
Albania Yes 01-10-2007
Algeria No
Andorra Yes 01-10-2015
Angola No
Antigua and Barbuda No
Argentina Yes 01-06-1991
Armenia Yes 01-04-2016
Aruba No
Australia Yes 01-09-1990
Austria Yes 01-09-1990
Azerbaijan No
Bahamas Yes 01-02-1994
Bahrain No
Bangladesh No
Barbados No
Belarus Yes 01-05-1995
Belgium Yes 01-05-1999
Belize Yes 01-09-1990
Benin No
Bhutan No
Bolivia Yes 13-07-2016
Bosnia and Herzegovina Yes 23-08-1993
Botswana No
Brazil Yes 01-04-2002
Brunei No
Bulgaria Yes 01-02-2004
Burkina Faso Yes 01-09-1992
Burundi No
Cambodia No
Cameroon No
Canada Yes 01-09-1990
Cape Verde No
Central African Republic No
Chad No
Chile Yes 01-07-1994
China (see Hong Kong or Macao) No
Colombia Yes 01-09-1998
Comoros No
Costa Rica Yes 01-04-2002
Croatia Yes 05-04-1993
Cuba No
Curaçao Yes 01-02-2024
Cyprus Yes 01-03-1995
Czech Republic Yes 01-03-1998
Democratic Republic of Congo No
Denmark Yes 01-07-1991
Djibouti No
Dominica No
Dominican Republic Yes 01-01-2005
East Timor No
Ecuador Yes 01-05-1992
Egypt No
El Salvador Yes 01-04-2002
Equatorial Guinea No
Eritrea No
Estonia Yes 01-04-2002
Ethiopia No
Fiji Yes 01-04-2003
Finland Yes 01-08-1994
France (including overseas territory) Yes 01-09-1990
Gabon Yes 01-04-2011
Gambia No
Georgia Yes 01-11-1997
Germany Yes 01-12-1990
Ghana No
Greece Yes 01-06-1993
Grenada No
Guatemala Yes 01-05-2002
Guinea-Bissau No
Guinea Yes 01-07-2012
Guyana No
Haiti No
Honduras Yes 01-06-1994
Hong Kong (China) Yes 01-09-1997
Hungary Yes 01-09-1990
Iceland Yes 01-12-1996
India No
Indonesia No
Iran No
Iraq No
Ireland Yes 01-10-1991
Israel Yes 01-12-1991
Italy Yes 01-05-1995
Ivory Coast No
Jamaica Yes 24-02-2017
Japan Yes 01-04-2014
Jordan No
Kazakhstan Yes 01-11-2014
Kenya No
Kiribati No
Kosovo No
Kuwait No
Kyrgyzstan No
Laos No
Latvia Yes 01-04-2002
Lebanon No
Lesotho Yes 01-12-2012
Liberia No
Libya No
Liechtenstein No
Lithuania Yes 01-10-2004
Luxembourg Yes 01-09-1990
Macau (China) Yes 01-03-1999
Madagascar No
Malawi No
Malaysia No
Maldives No
Mali No
Malta Yes 01-04-2002
Marshall Islands No
Mauritania No
Mauritius Yes 01-08-1993
Mexico Yes 01-10-1991
Micronesia No
Moldova Yes 01-04-2002
Monaco Yes 01-03-1993
Mongolia No
Montenegro Yes 30-06-2006
Morocco Yes 01-06-2010
Mozambique No
Myanmar (Burma) No
Namibia No
Nauru No
Nepal No
New Zealand Yes 01-09-1991
Nicaragua No
Niger No
Nigeria No
North Korea No
North Macedonia Yes 02-09-1993
Norway Yes 01-09-1990
Oman No
Pakistan No
Palau No
Palestinian Territories No
Panama Yes 01-06-1994
Papua New Guinea No
Paraguay Yes 01-04-2002
Peru Yes 01-05-2002
Philippines Yes 01-03-2023
Poland Yes 01-11-1992
Portugal Yes 01-09-1990
Puerto Rico No
Qatar No
Republic of Congo No
Romania Yes 01-03-1993
Russia Yes 01-04-2016
Rwanda No
Saint Kitts and Nevis Yes 01-10-1994
Saint Lucia No
Saint Martin (Dutch part) No
Saint Martin (French part) Yes 01-09-1990
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines No
Samoa No
San Marino Yes 01-04-2018
Sao Tome and Principe No
Saudi Arabia No
Senegal No
Serbia Yes 26-04-2001
Seychelles Yes 01-04-2016
Sierra Leone No
Singapore Yes 01-10-2015
Slovakia Yes 01-02-2001
Slovenia Yes 01-07-1994
Solomon Islands No
Somalia No
South Africa Yes 01-11-1997
South Korea Yes 01-04-2017
Spain Yes 01-09-1990
Sri Lanka Yes 01-04-2002
Sudan No
Suriname No
Swaziland No
Sweden Yes 01-09-1990
Switzerland Yes 01-09-1990
Syria No
Tadjikistan No
Tanzania No
Thailand Yes 01-12-2002
Togo No
Tonga No
Trinidad and Tobago Yes 01-06-2002
Tunisia Yes 01-03-2023
Turkey Yes 01-08-2000
Turkmenistan Yes 01-05-1998
Tuvalu No
Uganda No
Ukraine Yes 01-02-2007
United Arab Emirates No
United Kingdom Yes 01-09-1990
United States Yes 01-09-1990
Uruguay Yes 01-01-2002
Uzbekistan Yes 01-04-2002
Vanuatu No
Vatican No
Venezuela Yes 01-01-1997
Vietnam No
Yemen No
Zambia No
Zimbabwe Yes 01-11-1995

Hague Convention Attorneys in Action

At Masters Law Group, our Hague Convention attorneys have extensive experience handling complex international disputes.

Navigating international family law can be complex and challenging, especially when it comes to child abduction disputes. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, aka the Hague Convention, is an international treaty that protects children from parental abduction across international borders. This blog will highlight rulings demonstrating the Convention’s effectiveness in resolving cross-border disputes.

Join us as we explore the legal framework, showing how it translates into real-world victories and how our Hague Convention attorneys can assist you. Here’s what you need to know.

UNDERSTANDING THE HAGUE CONVENTION

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”). It provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from the U.S. can petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. Each country appoints central authorities to help resolve these disputes. As of 2024, there are 91 countries involved in the Hague Convention.

Families need to understand the importance of the Hague Convention when they find themselves involved in international disputes. Here are some tips to follow if you find yourself in this situation:

  • Prompt action is crucial: If you believe your child has been wrongfully removed or retained in a Hague Convention country, it is essential to act promptly. Initiating legal proceedings increases the chances of a successful resolution.
  • Contact the central authority: In the United States, the Office of Children’s Issues within the U.S. Department of State is the foremost authority for Hague Convention matters. They can provide information, resources, and assistance locating and returning your child.
  • Gather evidence: It is essential to gather evidence demonstrating your child’s habitual residence and the wrongful removal or retention. Documentation such as birth certificates and communication records can strengthen your case.
  • Consulting with a family law attorney: A family law attorney with experience in Hague law is recommended. They can guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of the Hague Convention.

Dealing with international disputes can be emotionally demanding, so preparing for the challenges is essential. Working with a Hague Convention attorney can provide valuable support. Now, let’s explore some recent Hague Convention cases to see how these principles are applied in real-world situations.

CASE 1: DISTRICT OF COLORADO / COLOMBIA: AGUIRRE

In our most recent case that concluded on February 20, 2024, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition to return his two children. His children were taken from his residence in Colombia to the United States by their mother. The parties were married in the United States in 2012 and lived together in Colombia. 

The Respondent took the children to the U.S. for a family reunion but faced delays in their passport renewal. This case arises under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq., which implements the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

This Act allows a person whose child has been removed from his custody in another country and taken to the United States to petition in federal or state court for the return of the child. The court would later find in favor of the Petitioner, concluding that the Respondent wrongfully retained the children and dismissing her claim of grave risk of harm. The Petitioner’s request for the return of the children to Colombia is granted.

CASE 2: EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN / MEXICO: HINNENDAEL

In the Eastern District of Wisconsin / Mexico, Hinnendael, the father of the children (Petitioner), sought to relocate his children back to the United States from Mexico against the other parent’s wishes.

The court found that returning the children would subject them to a grave risk of psychological harm or otherwise place them in an intolerable situation. Accordingly, the retention of children in the United States was not wrongful within the meaning of the Convention. The petition was denied, and this action was dismissed.

By invoking the Hague Convention, our attorneys successfully advocated for the children. This case helps highlight the effectiveness of the Hague Law in resolving child abduction cases and prioritizing the children’s welfare.

CASE 3: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS / NEW ZEALAND: H.O.

In the Northern District of Illinois / New Zealand, Ho, the husband – represented by our firm –  filed a petition for the return of his child. The child was taken from his residence in New Zealand to the United States by his wife – the mother of the child. As relevant here, the Hague Convention provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence.

By agreement of the parties and as required by the Convention, the court concludes that the child was a habitual resident of New Zealand at the time of the wrongful retention in the United States. The Petitioner exercised parental responsibility rights under New Zealand law, and this case did not establish the “grave risk” exception.

The court granted the petition for the child’s return to New Zealand and allowed an approximate one-week period to avoid any abrupt transition for the child. This case demonstrated the Hague Law’s role in helping ensure fairness, predictability, and respect for due process in international child abduction cases.

CASE 4:NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS / LITHUANIA: SULCAITE

In the Northern District of Illinois / Lithuania, Sulcaite Masters Law Group helped resolve the wrongful removal of children. The courts considered the parents’ last shared intent to their child’s country of residence.

The Respondent and the Petitioner agreed that their children would reside in Chicago temporarily. After three years, they were to return to Lithuania, their country of origin.

However, as time passed, the children became acclimated to their new life in the United States. Their mother’s remarriage and new baby created a strong family bond, and Chicago gradually became their familiar home. Considering these factors, the court denied the Petitioner for the children’s return. The decision reflected a recognition of the children’s well-being and stability, prioritizing their best interests.

This case showcases the effective advocacy of our Hague Convention attorneys in navigating complex international disputes. The legal team successfully obtained a favorable outcome for the parties involved by presenting compelling evidence.

CASE 5: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / CYPRUS: EFTHYMIOU V. LABONTE

In the Northern District of California / Cyprus, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition to return his child, who was taken from Cyprus to the United States by his wife – the child’s mother. The child’s father (Petitioner) had full parental rights to the child since his parents’ separation in 2014. The minor came to the United States for a six-week visit with his mother (Respondent) in California. At the end of the visit, the Petitioner came to collect his son but was unsuccessful.

Nearly one week after the scheduled meet-up went awry, the child’s father filed a Hague Convention plea. The court granted the petition and ordered the child to return to Cyprus in the custody of his father. In addition, the court did not impose a longer stay without agreement from both sides. The court ultimately ordered the return of a child under an action under U.S.C.S.C. § 9003.

These cases showcase our commitment to navigating international child abduction disputes and achieving favorable outcomes for our clients.

WORK WITH OUR HAGUE CONVENTION ATTORNEYS

The Hague Convention continues to play a pivotal role in reuniting families affected by parental child abduction. At Masters Law Group, we understand the complexities of international child abduction disputes and the importance of finding a resolution that aligns with your objectives.

Our Hague Convention attorneys will tirelessly advocate for your interests and work towards a favorable outcome. We prioritize open communication with our clients and strive to provide personalized attention to address your concerns.

To learn more about how we can help you, schedule your complimentary consultation today.

Demystifying the Hague Convention: Essential FAQs Answered

The nightmare of having your child taken across borders is a frightening reality for a growing number of parents across the globe. Under the Hague Convention, solutions are provided for parents who seek the return of their child to their country of habitual residence.

International Parental Child Abduction is an act of illegally taking a child from their residing home by one of the parents across international borders. If you suspect the possible scenario of International Parental Child Abduction in your family, here are some questions and answers that can provide valuable insight.

1. What is the Hague Convention?

The Hague Convention was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA). This law provides help to parents whose child or children have been wrongfully removed from or retained in their custody. They may petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence.

This Hague treaty was developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and entered into force in December 1983. There are over 93 countries that participate in the treaty. This treaty governs the way other countries’ legal systems work together. There were two specific goals in mind at the time of The Hague Services Convention’s formation:

  • Create a means to help ensure judicial and extrajudicial documents to be served abroad can be brought to the notice of the addressee in sufficient time.
  • Improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

2. What Is “Wrongful Removal” Under The Hague Convention?

Deciding whether to file a Hague application is a big decision. It depends on the specific circumstances of each case. A wrongful removal or retention of a child is considered illegal if it violates your custodial rights and you were exercising those rights at the time of the removal or retention.

In order for the Hague Convention to apply, it must have been in force between the two countries when the wrongful removal occurred. When a country joins the Convention, it doesn’t automatically partner with all countries that have ratified or joined it. Instead, countries must accept another country’s accession to the Convention before forming a treaty partnership.

3. How Can A Hague Lawyer Help?

A Hague Convention lawyer has experience handling cases related to international child abduction and custody disputes governed by the Hague Convention. They possess in-depth knowledge of the Convention’s provisions, procedures, and legal precedents, enabling them to navigate the complexities of your case effectively. Here’s how a Hague lawyer can assist you:

  • International Legal Aid: Hague lawyers often have established networks of lawyers and resources worldwide, facilitating communication and collaboration across international borders.
  • Negotiation and Mediation: A Hague lawyer can represent your interests during negotiations. Reaching an amicable resolution through negotiation or mediation is preferable to lengthy court proceedings.
  • Court Representation: If your case proceeds to court, your Hague lawyer will advocate on your behalf, presenting compelling arguments and evidence to support your child’s return to their country of habitual residence.

4. How Long Is The Hague Convention Process?

Contrary to common belief, the Hague Convention doesn’t guarantee the automatic return of a child in every case. While it provides a legal framework for facilitating such returns, various circumstances, defenses, and exceptions may complicate matters. Some cases can be resolved relatively quickly, within weeks or months.

While others may drag on longer, especially if they involve complex legal proceedings or appeals, one exception is when there are genuine concerns about the child’s safety or well-being. In such cases, the Hague Convention prioritizes the child’s welfare and safety. Working with a Hague lawyer can help you understand what steps to take to get the swift and safe return of your child.

5. What Steps Should I Take If My Child Has Been Wrongfully Taken?

Discovering that your child has been wrongfully taken across borders is a harrowing experience. Acting swiftly and decisively is crucial if you are in this unfortunate situation. Here are essential steps to consider as you navigate this distressing ordeal:

  • Consult with a Hague Lawyer: Seek legal advice from a Hague Convention lawyer. They can assess your case and guide you through the legal process.
  • File a Hague Application: Depending on your country of residence, you may need to apply the Hague Convention through the appropriate central authority. Your lawyer can assist you with completing and submitting the necessary documentation.
  • Gather Evidence: Collect evidence supporting your claim. This includes documentation of your custody rights, evidence of the child’s habitual residence, and communication with the other party regarding the abduction.
  • Cooperate with Authorities: Work closely with law enforcement, central authorities, and Hague lawyers involved in your case. Provide them with any requested information or assistance to facilitate the prompt resolution.

Finding Legal Representation

Selecting a Hague lawyer familiar with state, federal, and international laws is crucial. Masters Law Group attorneys Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have years of experience handling Hague Convention cases. Our experience in the Hague Convention field shows our competence in providing legal counsel for these stressful scenarios.

For more information, here are a few of our highlighted Hague Convention cases:

Contact our office today to schedule your consultation.

MASTERS LAW GROUP HAGUE CONVENTION CASE REVIEW: THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO/COLUMBIA

International parental abductions have been reported in countries all over the world. In one of our most recent Hague Convention cases, the attorneys at Masters Law Group succeeded in this landmark ruling in favor of our client.

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

In our most recent case that concluded on February 20, 2024, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition for the return of his two children, who were taken from his residence in Colombia to the United States by his wife – the mother of the children. As relevant here, the Hague Convention provides that a parent whose child or children have been wrongfully removed or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

CASE OVERVIEW

Before the Court is Petitioner’s Verified Complaint and Petition for Issuance of a Show Cause Order and for Return of Minor Children to Colombia (D. 1). The Court held a bench trial on February 14-16, 2024, with both parties physically present and testifying. The Court GRANTED the petition for the following reasons.

Case Background

This case involves a Hague Convention petition for the return of two minor children born in Colombia to a Colombian citizen petitioner and a United States citizen respondent. The parties were married in the United States in 2012 and lived together in Colombia. The respondent, a full-time childcare provider, took the children to the U.S. for a family reunion but faced passport renewal delays. The Petitioner acquiesced to the extended stay. Despite attempts to attend mediation remotely, The Petitioner canceled, insisting it be rescheduled upon their return to Colombia.

This case arises under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq., which implements the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

The Act entitles a person whose child has been removed from his custody in another country and taken to the United States to petition in federal or state court for the return of the child.

CASE RESULTS

The Court finds in favor of the Petitioner, concluding that the Respondent wrongfully retained the children and dismissing her claim of grave risk of harm. The Petitioner’s request for the return of the children to Colombia is granted.

Respondent is ordered to ensure the children’s return to Colombia within 28 days, by March 20, 2024, either with herself or an authorized caregiver. Seven days before their departure, Respondent must provide details of the return flight to the Petitioner.

Petitioner may seek reimbursement for expenses following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Respondent is liable for costs, legal fees, and transportation unless proven clearly inappropriate.

The case is hereby closed.

Date: February 20, 2024.

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

HAGUE CONVENTION – INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION LAW WITH MASTERS LAW GROUP

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

If you are faced with instituting or defending child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in the United States, work with the experienced lawyers at Masters Law Group. Contact us here today to schedule a consultation.

The Muddy Waters of Financial Restitution Against Parental Abductors

In federal court, a convicted offender may be ordered to reimburse victims for financial losses incurred due to the offender’s crime. This reimbursement is called “restitution”. Parental International Child Abduction is against the law, however, the provisions of such cases are not crystal clear. Read on to learn more. 

Parental kidnapping on an international level is on the rise, and it has become a serious concern for many. We often wonder whether the law considers it a crime, and the answer is definitely “yes”.

Individual perpetrators may be held responsible for reparations in international criminal procedures, yet experiences to date demonstrate this to be an unlikely avenue for the majority of victims.

Under U.S. law, a left-behind parent whose child has been abducted to the United States can seek reimbursement from the abducting parent for the expenses incurred in seeking the child’s return. 22 U.S.C. §9007(b)(3).

However, there is no clear provision entitling a left-behind parent whose child has been abducted out of the United States to seek reimbursement from the abducting parent for the expenses incurred in seeking the child’s return to his or her home country.

Here’s what you need to know about financial restitution against parental abductors.

Gray Areas of Financial Restitution

Restitution is the practice of holding offenders accountable for the financial losses suffered by victims of their crimes. Restitution may be ordered in both juvenile and criminal courts to compensate victims for out-of-pocket expenses that are the direct result of a crime. When it comes to International Child Abduction cases through The Hague Convention, the Ninth and Tenth Circuits appear to disagree on whether federal law allowing restitution to crime victims can be used to recoup a left-behind parent’s legal expenses.

Examples of Financial Restitution

The Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 permits a federal district court to order a criminal defendant to pay restitution to a victim in an amount up to “expenses related to participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense.” 18 U.S.C. §3663(b)(4). But as you’ll read below, on appeal, the Tenth Circuit overturned the restitution award.

In 2002, U.S. v. Cummings, 281 F.3d 1046,  the defendant’s father was convicted of violating the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act (IPKCA) by abducting his children from their home in Washington State to Germany. 

The mother who was left behind brought a return action against the father under the Hague Abduction Convention and an action in Washington State for contempt of court for violating a custody order. The father was sentenced to jail time, ordered to pay the mother’s legal fees and expenses, and required to participate in counseling.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the restitution award, holding that the mother’s civil cases were not “wholly separate” from the government’s prosecution of the father. This was supported by the fact that, by initiating a case under the Hague Convention, the mother had followed the procedure specifically described in the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act as the preferred “option of first choice” for a left-behind parent.

In 2020, U.S. v. Mobley, 971 F.3d 1187, did not follow the Cummings verdict. In Mobley, the government prosecuted a mother under the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act (IPKCA) for her abduction of her children from their home in Kansas to Russia. Once she was in Russia, she filed for divorce and custody; the left-behind father then sued for divorce and custody in Kansas. 

The Russia court had given custody to the mother, and the Kansas Court gave custody to the father. The district court found the mother guilty under the IPKCA and ordered restitution to the father of legal fees and expenses that he incurred in connection with both civil cases.

However, on appeal, the Tenth Circuit held that the trial court erred in awarding restitution under 18 U.S.C. §3663 because the expenses incurred were not related to the investigation or prosecution of the mother’s criminal offense. It held that these terms are limited to proceedings related to the government’s investigation or prosecution and those proceedings related to attendance at court related to such matters. 

The evidence showed that while there was no evidence that the government sanctioned or directed the father’s civil proceedings, there was also no evidence that his suit assisted in any way in the criminal prosecution against the mother.

Based on the analysis of the current state of international law, it is clear that the state has positive duties to prevent violations and demonstrate due diligence. But there’s a long way to go.

How Masters Law Group Can Help

There is an increasing trend in favor of enabling individual victims of violations of international humanitarian law to seek reparation directly from the responsible State. However, the water is muddy to say the least. In future cases, the recent codification of international criminal law has significantly influenced the discourse on post-conflict justice, while legal research on post-conflict justice has been inspired by the rapid developments in international justice mechanisms. As a result, much focus has been on the accountability of perpetrators, in particular, in the application of universal jurisdiction.

The family law attorneys at Masters Law Group are highly experienced with international parental child abduction disputes. If you believe your child is at threat of being abducted by a parent, legal guardian, or someone acting on their behalf, contact us today for a consultation.

For more information on our recent Hague Decisions, see here: