Tag Archive for: Hague Convention Law

International Child Abduction: How to Win a Hague Convention Case

International parental child abduction cases are among the most emotionally charged and legally complex disputes in family law. In 2023, 4.1% of the 28,886 missing children cases reported to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) were classified as family abductions—highlighting the prevalence and gravity of this issue.

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction provides a vital framework to address these cross-border disputes. However, navigating a Hague Convention case requires meticulous preparation, a comprehensive understanding of the law, and skilled legal representation.

In this blog, we’ll delve into the workings of the Hague Convention, outline effective strategies for winning a case, and demonstrate how Masters Law Group’s extensive experience can guide parents in reuniting with their children.

Understanding the Hague Convention

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a treaty established in 1980 to provide a standardized process for resolving international parental abduction cases. The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) includes 91 permanent members, comprising 90 countries and the European Union. All members agree to adhere to the Convention’s guidelines, helping ensure a unified approach to protecting children from wrongful removal or retention.

The core objectives of the Hague Convention include:

  1. Prompt Return: To help ensure the swift return of abducted children to their country of habitual residence.
  2. Deterrence: To prevent parents from using international borders to gain an advantage in custody disputes.

Steps in a Hague Convention Case

1. Filing a Hague Petition

The first step in a Hague Convention case is for the left-behind parent to file a petition in the country where the child is currently located. This is a critical legal document that initiates the process and sets the stage for the case. The petition must establish the following key elements:

  • The child is under 16 years of age.
  • The child’s habitual residence before the abduction.
  • The violation of custody rights under the child’s habitual residence laws.

2. Proving Wrongful Removal or Retention

The petitioner bears the responsibility of proving that the child’s removal or retention was wrongful under the Hague Convention. To do so, they must demonstrate two critical elements:

  1. Custodial rights were being actively exercised at the time of the abduction: This could involve showing evidence of regular involvement in the child’s life, such as visitation, financial support, or shared decision-making.
  2. The child was wrongfully removed or retained: The petitioner must establish that the child’s relocation violated custody rights recognized under the laws of the habitual residence.

Courts require clear and convincing evidence to support these claims. This may include legal documentation, witness testimony, or authoritative interpretations of custody laws in the child’s habitual residence. Collaborating with an experienced Hague Convention attorney can help your case be thoroughly prepared and presented effectively.

3. Defending Against Exceptions

While the Hague Convention prioritizes the prompt return of abducted children, it also provides limited defenses for the abducting parent. These defenses are not meant to re-litigate custody but to address exceptional circumstances. The most common defenses include:

  • There is a grave risk of harm if the child is returned.
  • The child has settled into the new environment (if over a year has passed since the abduction).
  • The child objects to returning and has reached an age and maturity to make such decisions.

Defenses under the Hague Convention are narrowly construed, and the burden of proof lies with the abducting parent to substantiate their claims. Courts carefully evaluate these exceptions to prevent help misuse and ensure the child’s best interests are protected.

Strategies for Success in Hague Convention Cases

1. Act Quickly

Time is critical in Hague Convention cases. Courts are more likely to return a child if the case is filed within one year of the abduction. Delays may result in the child becoming “settled” in their new environment, complicating the case.

2. Gather Robust Evidence

Establishing habitual residence and wrongful removal requires strong evidence, such as:

  • School or daycare records.
  • Medical and vaccination records.
  • Testimonies from friends, teachers, or community members familiar with the child’s living situation.

3. Address Potential Defenses Proactively

If the abducting parent raises defenses under the Hague Convention, be prepared to counter these arguments. For example:

  • If claiming grave risk of harm, provide evidence that the child will be safe in their habitual residence.
  • If the child objects to returning, demonstrate that the abducting parent may have influenced the objection.

4. Work with Experienced Legal Counsel

Navigating a Hague Convention case requires in-depth legal knowledge. Working with a law firm experienced in international parental child abduction cases, like Masters Law Group, can significantly improve your chances of success.

How Masters Law Group Can Help Best Hague Convention Attorney

At Masters Law Group, we understand the profound emotional and legal challenges involved in Hague Convention cases. With extensive experience representing clients in international parental child abduction disputes, we are dedicated to guiding you through these complexities with care and expertise.

Our attorneys have successfully handled numerous Hague Convention cases, delivering favorable outcomes for parents seeking the return of their children. We provide comprehensive support at every stage of the Hague Convention process, from filing the initial petition to representing you in court. Here’s how we can help:

  • Collect and present compelling evidence to prove wrongful removal or retention.
  • Develop strategies to address and counter defenses raised by the opposing party.
  • Advocate effectively in court to secure the prompt return of your child.

Explore our proven track record and expertise in this area of law by reviewing our case successes here.

Final Thoughts

International parental child abduction cases present significant emotional and legal challenges, but the Hague Convention provides a framework for parents to seek justice. Act swiftly is essential if you want to increase your chances of success.

At Masters Law Group, we are committed to helping parents navigate the complexities of Hague Convention cases. With a proven track record and a client-focused approach, our team is dedicated to reuniting families and providing the best outcomes for children. Let us guide you through this challenging time and help bring your child home.

Contact our Hague Convention attorneys today to schedule a consultation. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: How long do Hague Convention cases typically take?
A: The Hague Convention aims to resolve cases within six weeks to prevent further disruption to the child’s life. However, delays can occur due to court backlogs, the complexity of the case, or challenges in gathering evidence. Working with the experienced attorneys at Masters Law Group can help streamline the process and avoid unnecessary delays.

Q: What if the child has dual citizenship?
A: Dual citizenship does not affect the protections of the Hague Convention. The key factor is the child’s habitual residence, not citizenship. Masters Law Group can help clarify its impact on your case and ensure your petition aligns with the Convention.

Q: Can I file a Hague Convention case if I don’t have a formal custody order?
A: The Hague Convention recognizes custody rights that arise naturally under the child’s habitual residence laws, even without a formal custody order. However, proving these rights may require additional evidence, such as legal statutes or documentation of parental involvement. Masters Law Group can assist in gathering the necessary proof to establish your custody rights.

Q: What happens if the child refuses to return?
A: If the child is of sufficient age and maturity, the court may consider their objections to returning. However, the court will also examine whether these objections are genuine or influenced by the abducting parent. Masters Law Group has experience handling these sensitive cases and can present evidence to help the child’s voice be heard appropriately and fairly.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance related to your case, consult an attorney experienced in Hague Convention matters.

Masters Law Group Case Review: Western District of Michigan/Brazil

At Masters Law Group, we are committed to protecting the rights of parents and children under international law. In our most recent Hague Convention case, we successfully negotiated a favorable resolution for our client, helping ensure the child’s best interests were prioritized.

In this case, which concluded on August 23, 2024, the respondent—represented by Masters Law Group—sought the return of his child, who had been taken from the United States. Masters Law Group, experienced in navigating complex international child custody disputes, recently represented the respondent in a case filed in the Western District of Michigan.

Case Overview: Western District of Michigan / Brazil

On August 23, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan approved an agreement between the parties involved. Masters Law Group represented the respondent, who was defending his right to retain his child in the United States. The case concerned whether the child was wrongfully removed or retained from their habitual residence and the appropriate legal remedies to be enforced.

Legal Framework and Key Issues

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) aims to protect children from international abduction by ensuring their prompt return to their country of habitual residence. In this case, the Petitioner sought the return of her child under the Convention, asserting that the child’s removal from Brazil to the United States was wrongful and violated custody rights under Brazilian law.

The primary issue in this case was determining whether the child should be returned to Brazil or if an alternate custody arrangement should be made to serve the child’s best interests. After thorough negotiation, both parties reached a comprehensive stipulation, which the court approved, effectively resolving the dispute. For the reasons stated below, the Court orders that the stipulation be approved and adopted.

The Stipulation Agreement

A stipulation and order is a legal document in which the parties involved in a case agree on certain facts, procedures, or actions and then submit this agreement to the court for approval. Once approved, the stipulation becomes an official court order. The stipulation agreement, in this case, establishes several key provisions to help ensure the well-being of the child and the rights of both parents:

  1. Child Custody: A custody order will be established simultaneously in Brazil and Michigan. The child will live with the mother during the school year and stay with the father during school breaks (summer, winter, and spring).
  2. Visitation and Communication: The father has visitation rights during school breaks in Brazil. The child will communicate daily with the other parent via WhatsApp.
  3. Transportation: Parents will share transportation responsibilities for parenting exchanges. The parent starting their time with the child will handle transportation.
  4. School Arrangements: The child will begin school in Michigan, staying with the father until December 27, 2024. After that, the child will virtually finish the first school semester in Brazil.
  5. Parental Access During Visits: Both parents agree to make the child available for parenting time when the other parent is visiting.
  6. Extracurricular Activities: The child may continue playing soccer while in Brazil.
  7. Passports and Citizenship: Both parents will cooperate in obtaining U.S. and Brazilian passports and dual citizenship for the child.
  8. Attorney Fees: Each parent will be responsible for their attorney fees and costs.
  9. Jurisdiction: The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms until both parties agree to dismiss the matter.

Case Results

The final agreement promotes a balanced parenting arrangement, helping provide consistent contact between the child and both parents. A parenting arrangement helps foster cooperation on citizenship and legal matters. This resolution reflects a collaborative approach to co-parenting, prioritizing the child’s best interests and providing clear guidelines for both parties moving forward. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan approved and adopted this stipulation as an official court order. Making all agreed-upon terms enforceable under its jurisdiction. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above stipulation is approved and adopted as an order of this court.

Date: August 23, 2024.

READ THE FULL CASE HERE.

Navigating International Family Law 

For families facing the complexities of international child custody disputes, it’s crucial to have experienced legal representation. With Masters Law Group by your side, navigating these challenging circumstances becomes more manageable. Your child’s safety is our top priority, and our team of attorneys can help you protect yourself and your children.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge and experience in cases involving the Hague Convention, enacted through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”).  They are uniquely positioned to help guide you through the legal process and fight for your child’s return to their rightful home.

 Contact us today to schedule your complimentary consultation.

Check out our featured Hague Decisions here.

Masters Law Group Hague Convention Case Review: The District of Iowa / Mexico

International parental abduction is a complex and emotionally charged issue that affects families worldwide. At Masters Law Group, we are committed to protecting the rights of parents and children under international law. In our most recent Hague Convention case, we succeeded in a landmark ruling in favor of our client.

In this case, which concluded on August 27, 2024, the respondent—represented by Masters Law Group—sought the return of her child, who had been taken from the United States. The Hague Convention helps protect children from international abduction. It allows a parent to petition for the return of their child to the country of habitual residence when wrongful removal or retention occurs.

Legal Framework and Key Issues

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) is designed to protect children from international abduction by helping ensure their prompt return to their habitual residence. To succeed in a petition under the Convention, the petitioner must establish that the child was wrongfully removed from their habitual residence and that the removal violated custody rights under the law of the habitual residence country. In this case, the key issues revolved around determining the child’s habitual residence, whether the petitioner had consented to the child’s removal, and whether returning the child to Mexico would pose a grave risk to their safety.

For the reasons stated below, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Amended Petition is DENIED. [ECF No. 5].

Case Overview

The parties’ relationship began in 2015, and they have since lived in various states in the U.S. before relocating to Mexico in 2023. In November 2023, the respondent took the child back to the United States, citing concerns for their safety, and sought a protective order against the petitioner. The order, granted by an Iowa state court, effectively barred the petitioner from contact with the respondent and their child, E.L.S., until November 2024, requiring the child to remain in Iowa. This led to the petitioner filing under the Hague Convention, claiming that the child was wrongfully removed from Mexico, the country of habitual residence.

Case Background

The court found that the child’s habitual residence was in the United States, not Mexico. Although the family had lived in Mexico briefly, the court determined that the child had not fully acclimated to life there. Factors such as the child’s young age, the short duration of residence in Mexico, and the family’s strong ties to the United States played a crucial role in this determination. The court concluded that the child was more “at home” in the United States, where she had spent most of her life.

The court examined whether the petitioner had consented to the child’s retention in the United States. The protective order issued by the Iowa state court, to which the petitioner had consented, included a provision that the child was to remain in Iowa until further orders. The court interpreted this consent as a concession to the child’s retention in the United States.

The respondent argued that returning the child to Mexico would expose her to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm due to the domestic violence she had experienced from the petitioner. The court found sufficient evidence of such a risk, considering the documented history of violence between the parties. The court concluded that returning the child to Mexico would indeed place her in an intolerable situation.

Case Results

After reviewing the evidence and legal arguments, the court accepted and adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court ruled that the petitioner had not proven that Mexico was the child’s habitual residence and that the child was wrongfully removed. Additionally, the defenses of acquiescence and grave risk were sufficiently established. As a result, the court denied the Amended Petition for the Return of the Child to Mexico.

The case is hereby closed.

Date: August 27, 2024.

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE.

Hague Convention Law With Masters Law Group

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have vast knowledge and experience with the Hague Convention, which was enacted through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”). Parents whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States must petition for the child’s return.

If you are facing child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention, Masters Law Group can help. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

Check out our featured Hague Decisions here.

MASTERS LAW GROUP HAGUE CONVENTION CASE REVIEW: THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO/COLUMBIA

International parental abductions have been reported in countries all over the world. In one of our most recent Hague Convention cases, the attorneys at Masters Law Group succeeded in this landmark ruling in favor of our client.

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

In our most recent case that concluded on February 20, 2024, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition for the return of his two children, who were taken from his residence in Colombia to the United States by his wife – the mother of the children. As relevant here, the Hague Convention provides that a parent whose child or children have been wrongfully removed or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

CASE OVERVIEW

Before the Court is Petitioner’s Verified Complaint and Petition for Issuance of a Show Cause Order and for Return of Minor Children to Colombia (D. 1). The Court held a bench trial on February 14-16, 2024, with both parties physically present and testifying. The Court GRANTED the petition for the following reasons.

Case Background

This case involves a Hague Convention petition for the return of two minor children born in Colombia to a Colombian citizen petitioner and a United States citizen respondent. The parties were married in the United States in 2012 and lived together in Colombia. The respondent, a full-time childcare provider, took the children to the U.S. for a family reunion but faced passport renewal delays. The Petitioner acquiesced to the extended stay. Despite attempts to attend mediation remotely, The Petitioner canceled, insisting it be rescheduled upon their return to Colombia.

This case arises under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq., which implements the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

The Act entitles a person whose child has been removed from his custody in another country and taken to the United States to petition in federal or state court for the return of the child.

CASE RESULTS

The Court finds in favor of the Petitioner, concluding that the Respondent wrongfully retained the children and dismissing her claim of grave risk of harm. The Petitioner’s request for the return of the children to Colombia is granted.

Respondent is ordered to ensure the children’s return to Colombia within 28 days, by March 20, 2024, either with herself or an authorized caregiver. Seven days before their departure, Respondent must provide details of the return flight to the Petitioner.

Petitioner may seek reimbursement for expenses following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Respondent is liable for costs, legal fees, and transportation unless proven clearly inappropriate.

The case is hereby closed.

Date: February 20, 2024.

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

HAGUE CONVENTION – INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION LAW WITH MASTERS LAW GROUP

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

If you are faced with instituting or defending child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in the United States, work with the experienced lawyers at Masters Law Group. Contact us here today to schedule a consultation.

The Hague Convention and Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner’s Custody Battle

Actress Sophie Turner has initiated a Hague Convention petition claiming her estranged husband, singer and actor Joe Jonas, ‘will not consent’ for their children to ‘return’ to England with her. Here’s a look at the details behind the case, plus we’ll take a look at other celebrities who have had high-stakes custody battles over the years.

After filing for divorce, Sophie Turner’s ex, Joe Jonas, is in a custody dispute over their two children: Willa, 3, and a 14-month-old daughter referred to as D. In her lawsuit, Turner alleges that Jonas is withholding their children’s passports, preventing them from joining her in England.

Best known for playing Sansa Stark on HBO’s Game of Thrones, Turner said in her petition that the couple had planned to raise their daughters in her native country. It also said the girls “are both fully involved and integrated in all aspects of daily and cultural life in England”.

Sophie Turner filed her petition under the child abduction clauses of the Hague Convention.

What is the Hague Convention?

International family law can be complex and challenging, especially concerning child custody disputes. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, aka the Hague Convention, is an international treaty that protects children from parental abduction across international borders.

The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980 Hague Convention) is a multilateral treaty that establishes proceedings for the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed or kept away from their home country. Currently, there are 101 Contracting States to the Hague Convention. Including the United States and the United Kingdom.

How Did They Get Here?

When Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas met through mutual friends in 2016, they kept most of their relationship out of the private eye. But things started to change after Joe proposed just one year after their relationship began. The couple went on to tie the knot at an epic wedding in Las Vegas in 2019, with a second wedding in France. In 2020, the introduced their first child to the family unit, and a second in 2022. But just a year later and four years after saying “I do”, they decided to go their separate ways.

Earlier this week, Turner was photographed having dinner with pop star Taylor Swift – who dated Jonas in 2008. Online gossip blogs were in overdrive as photos of the two, walking along arm-in-arm, went viral.

Despite calling the split “amicable”, Jonas, 34, filed for divorce in a Florida court on September 1, but according to Turner, 27, she only learned about the divorce through the media five days later. Jonas has disputed this saying he did not surprise Turner with divorce papers but rather filed for divorce after what he said were “multiple conversations with Sophie”.

Wherever the truth lies in who initiated the divorce and how, the focus remains on their children and where they will reside.

The plan was for Turner to travel to New York after filming wrapped on September 14 to collect the children, but in the meantime “the breakdown of the parties’ marriage happened very suddenly,” Turner said. Turner says she and Jonas saw each other on September 17 — and she asked him for the children’s passports so she could take them back to England.

But Jonas refused to turn over the girls’ passports, who were born in the US, and have dual US-British citizenship. Turner then filed her petition, now public, which Masters Law Group has revised, in federal court in New York under the child abduction clauses of the Hague Convention — an international treaty aimed at compelling the return of a child taken from their country of “habitual residence.”

The Turner/Jonas Hague Convention Case

The court filing says the girls are temporarily living with Turner in a Manhattan hotel.

Joe Jonas has released a statement in response to Turner’s lawsuit. The statement mentioned that the former couple had a “cordial” meeting in New York, during which they discussed working together for an amicable co-parenting arrangement. However, hours later, Turner expressed her desire to permanently take the children to the UK. The statement read, “Less than 24 hours later, Sophie advised that she wanted to take the children permanently to the UK. Thereafter, she demanded via this filing that Joe hand over the children’s passports so that she could take them out of the country immediately.” This has been reported by PEOPLE.

Sophie Turner claims that she and Joe Jonas agreed during discussions on Christmas in 2022 to make England their “forever home.” According to the documents, they sold their Miami home and were in the process of buying a new residence in the English countryside in April.

“The children were born in the US and have spent the vast majority of their lives in the US. They are American citizens,” the spokesperson said.

They added that Jonas wished for Turner to “reconsider her harsh legal position and move forward in a more constructive and private manner” and that “his only concern is the well-being of his children.”

Jonas has also denied Turner’s claims in the court documents that she found out about the divorce from media reports – saying she was aware in advance.

Celebrities & Child Custody/Parental Responsibilities Cases

Unfortunately, Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas aren’t the first Hollywood couple to face divorce cases involving parental responsibilities (formerly Child Custody) disputes.

Celebrities who have been involved in high-profile child custody battles in the past, include:

  1. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt: This Hollywood power couple had a highly publicized custody battle following their divorce in 2016. They reached a temporary agreement, and the case has seen various developments since then and still ongoing.
  2. Halle Berry and Gabriel Aubry: Halle Berry and her ex-boyfriend Gabriel Aubry had a contentious custody battle over their daughter, Nahla, following their separation.
  3. Usher and Tameka Foster: Singer Usher and his ex-wife Tameka Foster were involved in a custody battle over their two children, which resulted in Usher gaining primary custody.
  4. Kelly Rutherford and Daniel Giersch: The “Gossip Girl” actress Kelly Rutherford had a prolonged custody battle with her ex-husband Daniel Giersch over their two children, involving international custody issues.
  5. Britney Spears and Kevin Federline: Pop star Britney Spears and her ex-husband Kevin Federline had a custody dispute over their two sons after their divorce.
  6. Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger: Actor Alec Baldwin and actress Kim Basinger had a highly publicized custody battle over their daughter, Ireland, which lasted for several years.
  7. Charlie Sheen and Denise Richards: Actor Charlie Sheen and his ex-wife Denise Richards were involved in a custody dispute over their two daughters.
  8. Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva: Actor Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva had a custody battle over their daughter after their tumultuous relationship ended.

Legal Assistance & Representation

It’s not just celebrities like Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas who are involved in international child abduction cases. If you are facing a similar legal battle, seeking the assistance of an attorney experienced in the Hague Convention can help you understand your legal options and how to take immediate action.

These attorneys possess the necessary knowledge and experience to guide parents through the legal process and protect their rights. If you have concerns about custody of your child and where they will reside, it is crucial to take proactive measures to safeguard their well-being. Your attorney may recommend several preventative measures, such as:

  1. Obtaining a custody order or parenting plan that clearly outlines each parent’s rights and responsibilities, including travel restrictions.
  2. Adding your child’s name to a watchlist to prevent unauthorized removal from the country.
  3. Obtaining a court order requires surrendering your child’s passport or imposing restrictions on international travel.
  4. Collaborating with your child’s school or daycare to establish security measures and emergency protocols.

As for Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas, the case continues. Read the “Verified petition for return of children to England” here.

 

 

 

The Hague Convention and Family Law: FAQs

Parental child abduction is a living nightmare for parents and families across the globe. But what happens when your child is taken overseas? Continue reading here to find out.

Living in an interconnected world makes it easier for families to extend across international borders. However, this can lead to legal challenges that require cross-country cooperation and understanding.  The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) is a treaty that many countries, including the United States, have joined. Its purpose is to protect children and their parents from the harmful effects of this growing crime.

If you have urgent questions or suspect you may face the scenario of International Parental Child Abduction in the future, here are some key questions and answers that could help.

FAQ 1: What Is The Hague Convention?

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained their custody may petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. This treaty was developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and entered into force in December 1983.

There are over 93 countries that participate in the treaty. This treaty governs the way other countries’ legal systems work together. There were two specific goals in mind at the time of The Hague Services Convention’s formation:

  • Create a means to ensure that judicial and extrajudicial documents to be served abroad can be brought to the notice of the addressee in sufficient time.
  • Improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

FAQ 2: How Important is Habitual Residence?

Habitual residence is a crucial concept within the Hague Convention. It refers to where a child has established a regular, integrated, and stable life. Determining habitual residence is essential in deciding which country’s legal system should govern issues like custody and visitation. This prevents parents from moving their children to another country to gain a legal advantage in custody disputes.

A left-behind parent pursuing their child’s return must demonstrate that the child was subjected to wrongful removal or retention per the Convention’s definition. It involves proving that the child’s habitual residence was in a foreign country immediately before the alleged illegal action occurred. The left-behind parent must also confirm their custody rights during the purported wrongful removal or retention.

FAQ 3: What issues arise in cross-border disputes under the Hague Convention?

There an infinite issues that could arise when dealing with international disputes. Often, many challenges intertwine legal, cultural, and jurisdictional complexities. While the Hague Convention emphasizes the prompt return of abducted children, certain exceptions exist, known as Hague Convention Defenses:

Defense 1: That the petitioner (parent seeking the return of the child) was not “actually exercising custody rights at the time of the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 2: The petitioner “had consented to or acquiesced in the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 3: More than one year passed from the time of the wrongful removal or retention until the date the petitioner commenced a judicial or administrative proceeding for the child’s return under Article 12.

Defense 4: The child is old enough and has a sufficient degree of maturity to knowingly object to being returned to the petitioner. It is appropriate to heed that objection under Article 13.

Defense 5: That “there is a grave risk that the child’s return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation,” under Article 13(b), and

Defense 6: That return of the child would subject the child to violation of basic human rights and fundamental freedoms under Article 20.

Furthermore, when a child has dual nationality, conflicts might arise regarding which country’s laws should be applied. Effective communication between the legal systems of different countries can also be hindered by language barriers, slowing down the resolution process. As these cases touch upon the sensitive matters of a child’s welfare and custodial rights, working with an established Hague Convention Attorney can help guide you through these challenging scenarios.

FAQ 4: How Does the Hague Convention Interact with Family Law Matters?

Central authorities are vital in facilitating communication and cooperation between the countries involved in a case. They work together to locate the child, gather necessary information, and resolve the situation quickly. The Hague Convention highlights the importance of minimizing a child’s time separated from their custodial parent. This allows them to maintain stability in their lives.

Mediation methods can also offer a more amicable solution to family disputes. Integrating mediation into the Hague Convention proceedings could allow families to address their concerns outside the courtroom, reducing emotional distress and fostering cooperative outcomes prioritizing the children’s well-being.

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of State and an experienced Family Law Firm dedicated to International Parental Child Abduction cases can also help to enforce the safe return of your child or children.

How Can I Find a Hague Convention Attorney?

To help ensure you have the best possible outcome in your Hague Convention case, you should seek an attorney who understands the intricacy of dealing with state, federal, and international laws.

Family law attorneys Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph of Masters Law Group have extensive experience in cases involving international child abduction disputes in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system. Our unique depth of knowledge, experience, and talent in the Hague Convention field highlights our competence in providing legal counsel for these fast-paced and stressful scenarios. 

For more information on our experience, here are a few of our highlighted Hague Convention cases:

Contact our office today to schedule your consultation.

What is The Hague Convention? (INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION)

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction provides an expeditious method to return a child internationally abducted by a parent from one member country to another. The powerful international treaty can yield beneficial results when implemented correctly and appropriately.

The Hague Convention has been in the headlines recently regarding the war with Russia and Ukraine. This has left many across the globe asking, “What is the Hague Convention?”.

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

The International Criminal Court in the Hague has issued an arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin. It accuses him of being responsible for war crimes in Ukraine, including the unlawful deportation of children. Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, Ms Maria Lvova-Belova, is also subject to an arrest warrant.

According to Ukraine, tens of thousands of possible war crimes have been carried out by Russian forces since they invaded Ukraine in February last year. The Hague Convention doesn’t just apply to war crimes; it also affects everyday civilians across the globe when their child has been wrongfully removed from their habitual residence.

Divorce and The Hague Convention

When parents divorce, deciding how to handle issues regarding their children can be intense. When parents originate from separate countries, these disputes can quickly become complicated, especially when one parent attempts to move children across international borders.

When this happens, you need a Hauge lawyer who is highly experienced in international law. They understand how to settle matters of jurisdiction involving courts in the United States and other countries across the globe (if these nations are a part of the convention).

The Hague Convention’s applicability can be determined by two factors:

(1) whether both parents have consented to their child’s removal from one country to another; or

(2) if a child has been wrongfully removed from one country and brought into another country without either parent’s consent.

Hauge Law is created in order to protect you and your family both nationally and internationally.

INITIATING THE PROCESS

Deciding whether to file a Hague application is an important decision and must be considered based on each case’s specific circumstances. Perhaps after separating from their partner, a parent wants to take their child and move to another country. Maybe a parent moved internationally in violation of a custody agreement.

Filing a case under the Convention does not guarantee that your child will be returned. To obtain the return of your child through a Hague proceeding, you must first be able to demonstrate the following:

  • That your child was habitually resident in one Convention country and was wrongfully removed to or retained in another Convention country;
  • The removal or retention of your child is considered wrongful if it was in violation of your custodial rights, and you were exercising those rights at the time of the removal or retention, or you would have been exercising them but for the removal or retention.
  • The Convention must have been in force between the two countries when the wrongful removal or retention occurred (the dates are different for every country); (Note: In many instances, when a country accedes to the Convention, it is not automatically partners with all of the other countries who have ratified or acceded to the Convention.  Countries must accept another country’s accession to the Convention under the terms described in the Convention before a treaty partnership is created.
  • The child is under the age of 16.

WHY CHOOSE MASTERS LAW GROUP?

International custody issues can be incredibly difficult to deal with as a parent because of the concern you have for the safety and security of your child, and should be handled properly by a knowledgeable attorney.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes and kidnapping in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Read the details of our most recent successful Hague Convention cases below. Furthermore, see what our clients have to say on representing their Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction case:

 

I had a very difficult case in the United States Federal Court. My ex husband filed a Petition against me under the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child abduction asking to return our two sons to Lithuania. Seeking for the legal representation, I was advised by the U.S. Department of State to contact lawyer Erin E. Masters. I was so lucky to have the team of the best lawyers Erin E. Masters and Anthony G. Joseph representing me in this difficult trial.

They represented with the highest standards of law, but also provided support and empathy through the process. The communication was fantastic, always answered every question, explained every situation and possible outcome. As it was a very fast track case, Erin and Anthony worked hard including weekends to prepare everything for the hearing. There was only one hearing and the Decision was totally in my favor. All my family, especially the kids, are very grateful! It is also fair to mention that the legal expenses for the amount of services provided was very very reasonable.

I will gladly recommend Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph to represent any of my friends and family in need of an excellent and highly professional family attorney.

— Aistė Šulcaitė

FINAL THOUGHTS

Instead of trying to figure out international law issues alone, contact the Family Law Attorneys at Masters Law Group. Serving clients in Cook County and DuPage County Illinois, our experienced team will help you navigate the legal complexities of your case and are committed to vigorously representing you in these frightening, high-stakes proceedings.

Contact us to schedule your consultation here today. 

Featured Hague Decisions:

Hague Convention – International Child Abduction – San Francisco

When San Francisco courts determine custody arrangements, they ultimately consider the best interests of the child involved. However, a custody agreement can get extremely complex when the issues are international. 

The Hague Convention was enacted to protect children from international abduction and to return children to their home country residence. It also includes child custody conflicts when a parent or guardian resides in a different country to the home country of the child.

If you’re in need of legal representation to protect your rights or the rights of your child, Masters Law Group can help. We can represent parents and children in a variety of complex international abduction cases. 

Here’s everything you need to know about international abduction cases and the Hague Convention in San Francisco. 

The Hague Convention

The Hague Convention is a treaty that works to help parents whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained from their custody by enabling them to petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. A number of counties have joined this treaty which was developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and officially entered into force in December 1983. 

According to the Convention, the removal or retention of a child is “wrongful” when it breaches custody rights attributed to a person or any other body. Even if a parent already has legal custody of the child, the Convention is needed to return the child back to their habitual residence. 

The Convention’s framework allows countries to help one another find solutions for difficult custody cases where a child is abducted. This doesn’t rely on the immigration status or nationality of the child. In certain situations, a child may be wrongfully detained in another country, where they are not a resident. Violations of custodial rights happen if the child is wrongfully removed from their habitual home and are now living in a foreign country. 

Presenting a custody order is not needed to prove that a parent’s custodial rights were violated when the child was taken from their country. This can be proven by showing proof of parenthood. 

Filing a Hague Application in San Francisco

Whether or not the Hague Convention is an appropriate solution for you depends on a variety of factors. Perhaps after separating from their partner, a parent wants to take their child and move to another country. Another situation may be that a parent moved internationally in violation of a custody agreement. It’s important to know that filing a case under the Hague Convention does not automatically guarantee the child will be returned. 

To obtain the return of the child, it must be proven that:

  • The child was habitually resident in one Convention country and was removed to or retained in another Convention country.
  • The removal or retention of the child is considered wrongful and was in violation of custodial rights, and those rights were exercised at the time of removal or retention.
  • The Convention must have been in force between the two countries at the time of the wrongful removal or retention. 
  • The child is under the age of 16.

If a court decides the child must be returned to its country of habitual residence, they may make the return contingent upon certain obligations from the petitioning parents. This might include: 

  • Paying for the travel of the respondent and child to the country where the child habitually resides.
  • Arranging housing or paying for living expenses for the respondent and child in the country of the child’s habitual residence. 
  • An order that the petitioner have no contact with the respondent if the respondent returns to the country of the child’s habitual residence. 
  • An order that the petitioner will have no contact or limited contact with the child once the child returns to the country of the habitual residence. 

Getting the Legal Help You Need in San Francisco

High-stakes international child abduction cases require experienced, knowledgeable and fast-acting attorneys. Your lawyer should be ready to file a Hague Convention application and institute or defend a Hague Convention lawsuit on short notice.

Our attorneys at Masters Law Group have extensive experience in international child abduction cases.  Instead of trying to navigate international law issues alone, take advantage of the experience and knowledge of our attorneys at Masters Law Group. We are committed to vigorously representing our clients in these high-stakes proceedings. 

Contact Masters Law Group Today

The award-winning attorneys at Masters Law Group have successfully represented clients in such cases across the country and globe; including Hague cases across the United States and Internationally in New Zealand, but to name a few.

Contact us to schedule your consultation here today.

What are the Defenses to the Hague Convention?

A parent who moves with a child from the child’s home country to another country may face accusations that the move is wrongful. The Hague Abduction Convention is an international agreement to safeguard intercountry adoptions and parental abductions. 

The Hague Convention is a treaty that the United States has joined, along with many other countries. Its purpose is to protect children from the harmful effects of international abduction by a parent.

When one parent applies to the State Court or Federal Court for return of a child who has been taken from a foreign country and brought to the United States, or is wrongfully retained in the United States beyond the agreed-upon time frame of a temporary absence, that parent may assert certain defenses to prevent the return.

The courts can deny the return of an abducted child under six conditions listed in the Convention, including if a child would be at risk of being subjected to physical or psychological harm, or otherwise placed in an intolerable situation.

Fun Fact: Masters Law Group is highly experienced with Hague Convention cases, with clients not only in the Greater Chicagoland area, but also across the United States in Washington, Hawaii and Wisconsin. 

Here’s what you need to know about the defenses to the Hague Convention.

What is the Hague Convention? 

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, codified as ICARA, allows a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States to petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

This treaty was developed by the Hague Conference on October 25, 1980, and went into effect on December 1, 1983. There were two specific goals in mind for Hague Services:

  • Create a means to ensure that judicial and extrajudicial documents to be served abroad can be brought to the notice of the addressee in sufficient time.
  • Improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

The removal of a child is “wrongful” whenever it breaches the rights of the person who has custody attributed to them at the time of removal. Even if a parent already has legal custody of a child, the Convention is needed. This is because U.S. court orders are not always recognized in other countries and sovereign nations can’t interfere with each other’s legal systems, judiciaries, or law enforcement. 

Under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), when a child has been wrongfully removed from his or her home country, the court must order the child to be returned to his or her home country, unless the party removing the child can establish at least one of six narrow affirmative defenses.

Six Defenses of the Hague Convention

Here are the following defenses to claim wrongful removal under the Hague Convention:

Defense 1: That the petitioner (parent seeking the return of the child) was not “actually exercising custody rights at the time of the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 2: That the petitioner “had consented to or acquiesced in the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 3: That more than one year passed from the time of the wrongful removal or retention until the date the petitioner commenced a judicial or administrative proceeding for the return of the child, under Article 12.

Defense 4: That the child is old enough and has a sufficient degree of maturity to knowingly object to being returned to the petitioner and that it is appropriate to heed that objection, under Article 13.

Defense 5: That “there is grave risk that the child’s return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation,” under Article 13(b), and

Defense 6: That return of the child would subject the child to violation of basic human rights and fundamental freedoms, under Article 20.

It’s important to note, you should make International Custody Agreements & Parenting Time schedules before you relocate your child/children. U.S. Courts will need to determine the best interest of the child before you do so. 

If you believe your child has been wrongfully removed to a country overseas, or if you would like to move your child out of the U.S. you should contact your trusted family law attorney immediately.  Your attorney can explain the proper steps for handling this matter and guide you toward a just outcome.

How Masters Law Group Can Help

Parents face many obstacles when it comes to seeking judicial intervention in the US for the return of their children.  Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Our Family Law Firm has extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence. Our clients span across the entire Unites States, from Washington to Wisconsin; so you can rest assured knowing the experienced Masters Law Group attorneys are fighting for you and your family.

Check out our Featured Hague Decisions:

If you are faced with the terrifying scenario of International Parental Child Abduction, contact your trusted Chicago attorneys at Masters Law Group here today to schedule a consultation.

Hague Convention – National Missing Children’s Day

Today is National Missing Children’s Day; dedicated to encouraging parents, guardians, caregivers, and others concerned with the well-being of children to make child safety a priority. If you are faced with the terrifying scenario of International Parental Child Abduction, here is what you need to know. 

National Missing Children’s Day was proclaimed by president Ronald Regan on May 25, 1983. This was to honor Etan Patz, a 6 year old boy who disappeared in New York City on May 25, 1979.

Every year for national missing children’s day, the Department of Justice commemorates Missing Children’s Day by honoring the heroic and exemplary efforts of agencies, organizations, and individuals to protect children.

Here, Masters Law Group covers the Hague Convention – aimed to protect children from international parental child abduction. Let’s take a look at the Hague Abduction Convention, and what you should know in honor of national missing children’s day.

HAGUE CONVENTION & ITS BACKGROUND

The Hague Convention is a treaty that many countries, along with the US have joined. On May 29, 1993, the Convention established international standards of practices for intercountry adoptions. The United States signed the Convention in 1994, and the Convention entered into force for the United States on April 1, 2008. 

The overall purpose of the Convention is to protect children from the harmful effects of international abduction by a parent by encouraging the speedy return of an abducted child to their country of habitual residence. As well as to organize and secure the effective rights of access to a child.

BECOME AWARE OF CHILD ABDUCTION

Awareness is one of the most important things you can do to prevent the unthinkable from happening. Oftentimes, the people who you least expect are capable of abducting your child are family members. It’s not unusual for a parent who abducts their child to believe that they know what is best for the child. 

Young children are the easiest to abduct because they don’t know to go for help or do anything to bring attention to their parents taking them. Some other warning signs and factors that are important to be aware of are:

  • A parent with no source of income/job.
  • A parent who is financially independent.
  • A parent with no real ties to the community they live in.
  • A parent who abruptly quits their job, sells their home, applies for passports.
  • A parent who starts collecting the child’s medical and school records.
  • A parent who has domestic violence and/or child abuse history.

Some additional steps to lower the risk of parental abduction or increase your odds recovering your child if they are abducted would be:

  • Have up-to-date pictures of your child.
  • Fingerprints of your child.
  • Have a written detailed description of your child including: height, weight, hair color, eye color, birthmarks, and noticeable physical characteristics.
  • Copies of your child’s Social Security card and passport.
  • Register your child with the Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (CPIAP).

THINGS YOU CAN DO THIS MISSING CHILDREN’S DAY

While all of the things mentioned above are great things to keep in mind, another layer of safety would be having child custody and visitation matters in place. Having a system that works for you and your child as well as the other parent involved can make it easier to keep accountability. 

Whenever a Child custody or visitation issue arises, you should report it to state or local law enforcement authorities or a state judicial officer. In addition to contacting the Department of State, Office of Children’s Issues, law enforcement or left-behind parents should also contact the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (“NCMEC”): www.missingkids.org. 

NCMEC works closely with the State Department and the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office for Victims of Crime and administers its Victim Reunification Travel Program. Eligible parents can request financial assistance so they can be reunited with a child located in another country or obtain travel support for the child’s return to the United States.

Lastly, seeking a family law firm who are highly experienced in cases involving international child custody disputes (in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system) could be an invaluable resource in this incredibly stressful time.

FINAL THOUGHTS

The commemoration of National Missing Children’s Day serves as a reminder to continue our efforts to reunite missing children with their families and an occasion to honor those dedicated to this cause. It’s important for the US along with other countries to be a part of the Hague Convention. By doing so, we can negotiate treaties to help streamline international justice. 

It is essential to have the help from a knowledgeable family law attorney who understands all of the legalities that go along with international child custody cases.

Our attorneys, Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph, have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”). 

See Our Featured Hague Decisions Here:

Contact us here today to learn more.